Five years after its 1999 launch in the USA, Coca-Cola had achieved a marketing miracle with its Dasani bottled water. It was time to โgrowโ the brand in Europe. Early in 2004, the company spent ยฃ7 million introducing Dasani to the UK as โpureโ bottled water, meaning (as The Grocer trade magazine pointed out) water taken from municipal sources, purified according to Coca-Colaโs own process, and revived โfor taste purposesโ with added mineral salts. It was tap water.
Worse, the โhighly sophisticated purification processโ proved to be identical to that used in household-sized domestic water purifiers.
Half a liter from the tap cost 0.03p; half a liter of Dasani cost 95p. Underlying economic outrage gave an edge to cackling headlines like โEau Dear!โ, โCokeโs in Hot Waterโ and โThe Real Sting!โ. But Dasani performed well in much of the world, and the company sniffily observed that the UK market for bottled water is โrelatively immatureโ. If their intention was to โdissโ Britain for failing to subscribe fully to the โlifestyle choiceโ of Cokeโs superior branding, they provoked only more gales of laughter.
Mirth turned to irritation when UK trading standards monitors looked closely at Dasani. Analysis challenged its use of the word โpureโ. It also dropped the bombshell that among Dasaniโs additives there were illegal levels of bromate, a dangerous carcinogen. There was no bromate at all in the source water. Britainโs Food Standards Agency (FSA) announced that โAny increased cancer risk is likely to be small [but] presents an unnecessary riskโ.
Five weeks after its glitzy launch, Coca-Cola withdrew all half a million bottles from circulation, and Dasani abandoned the UK. Coke had suckered itself with a PR disaster.
When: February to March 2004
Where: UK
Toll: Apart from its embarrassment and financial loss in the UK, Coca-Cola faced reviews of its water bottling procedures in many places, including the USA.
You should know: In the US, Dasani is promoted as ‘better than natural’ water. Among a series of ads using actors dressed in ‘what look like off-off Broadway animal costumes’ is one showing a ‘camel’ to suggest ‘natural’ means tasting like ‘sandy’ water; and a ‘bear’ to suggest ‘natural’ can mean ‘tastes fishy’. What’s not clear any more is whether it is the manufacturer or the consumer who is losing the plot.